Lawless AI necessitates Digital ID controls

How the Internet is being nuked by angry social engineers

Every month we see big headlines about AI innovations—whether real or fraudulent—and it’s enough to stimulate hundreds of billions of dollars of investment per year. The mediocre trickle of progress is enough to keep AI on the ordinary person’s radar, but while most conspiracy researchers are concerned about big threats like the Singularity (ie. machines becoming conscious) or some catastrophic military application, I believe the real purpose of the AI hysteria is much simpler: to generate enough legal precedent to justify regulating the Internet itself. That’s a simple concept, but here I want to talk about the actual smoke and mirrors being used to keep this artificial crisis going long enough to present their Digital ID “solution.”

Bill Gates and the Fourth Industrial Revolution™

Let’s start by looking at how such a disappointing technology has managed to become the Only Game in Town, and how Bill Gates in particular tricked millions of unsuspecting people into turning Silicon Valley junk into Wall Street gold, with the aim of destroying the free and open Internet.

I enjoy using AI to create images sometimes, but for serious applications AI pretty much sucks. Yet that doesn’t stop the ever-increasing hyperbole about how it will revolutionize every aspect of life, driven by greed and delusion. In recent years, trillions of dollars of investment into Artificial Intelligence has been propping up the USA’s crippled GDP. This puts it in a special category of protected national treasure, rather than dangerous liability. But we should already know that the GDP is only struggling because it has been artificially hamstrung by over-regulation, anti-consumer practices, DEI, and other scams of the elite. It’s by design, like a controlled collapse. The USA has had both its hands tied behind its back specifically so that blackmailed Silicon Valley freaks and the Futurists From Hell can spook ignorant Wall Street Baby Boomers into thinking that the only way forward is some version of a Fourth Industrial Revolution dystopia promoted by Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates.

After all, if their endgame is for technocrat nerds to rule the world, then obviously there needs to be a unique crisis of traditional society that only they, the innovation experts, can solve. Hence, the normal economy needs to implode by any means necessary, and the Futurists From Hell need to ride to the rescue, whether on false promises or not.

I would go further, and say that the Western World in general has been sabotaged for 15+ years in order to stop Millennials—with our love of the free, open Internet—from successfully reforming society on our own. Far from creating a crisis with unlimited Internet access and hedonistic porn, video games, and freedom of speech, we have embodied the best of the Internet on average. We consistently promoted healthy alternatives, whether in diet, news, or entertainment, creating a paradigm shift in consumer habits. We tried to steer mankind towards skepticism, rational thinking, and transparency, and it was working. Millennials, using the best parts of the Internet, created a support system for smart and influential creators, for helping out those in need, and for uncovering the truth about global evil. Ever since Occupy Wall Street (2011), however, controlling the Internet has been a top priority of the social engineering class. That’s not easy, because it’s become so integral to modern life, with the Millennials being the first generation to truly grow up with it as part of their adult identity. AI is essentially a PSYOP designed to nuke the human-driven, Millennial-dominated Internet from functioning, with the “Dead Internet Theory” being the current buzzword for what it looks like when the weapon is working as intended.

COVID-19 Data Harvesting

If we go back to 2019, right before the COVID-19 pandemic (which humanitarian Bill Gates was so kind in helping to simulate in Event 201,) we see that Microsoft spent $1 billion on OpenAI, connecting the two forever.

Microsoft exclusively hosts OpenAI’s services on their Azure cloud servers, meaning they have access to all of the data, in addition to making money from ChatGPT. They are forcing Co-Pilot onto anybody who uses their spyware service called Windows, which is at the point of being a keylogger with a direct line to the NSA. The Recall debacle is such a red flag it may as well be soaked in blood.

The reason Microsoft gave for this investment into OpenAI was that Google and other Big Tech companies were pulling ahead, and Microsoft was worried about falling behind forever. While it’s true that Microsoft had no AI products to speak of, nobody else was making real progress either. Even the best AI products in 2019 were clearly unacceptable for any serious application, just like today. But behind the scenes, Bill Gates knew about a certain global event that would allow the technocrats to rewrite the rules of society.

Nobody seems to have noticed that, in order to get AI to function at all, the COVID-19 lockdowns were implemented to force “work from home” and Zoom calls to force millions of students and experts into having their privileged, technical, routine, day-to-day, subject-heavy conversations on Microsoft’s data-harvesting service. Having tracked this correlation in real-time during 2020 through 2023, I recognized that ChatGPT became “smarter” in direct proportion to how many lawyers, engineers, accountants, and other professionals were forced to talk to each other on Zoom specifically. Of course, there were other, better alternatives to Zoom in the market already (including Google Meet), but the corporate hivemind uniformly demanded that Microsoft, with its investment into OpenAI, receive all the data. Google believed that Web Crawling and search-indexing would be enough to steal all the data necessary to create functional AI, but there was too much “offline intelligence” for their plan to work. Even Facebook, which was always DARPA’s LifeLog spy system, failed to scrape up the rest. Workplace and classrooms were a category of knowledge that no Big Tech company had in their pocket before COVID-19. OpenAI’s success is a direct result of the Zoom call data harvesting scheme.

Today, Microsoft and OpenAI are collaborating with Donald Trump’s White House in order to achieve the “Project Stargate” AI PSYOP.

The New Cold War

Considering how underwhelming and impractical AI tech has proven in real-world scenarios despite the outrageous spending, it seems suspicious to me why it remains #1 in the minds of the rich and powerful. The “Invisible Hand” of the social engineering class has been guiding the conversation around AI via headlines and social media to make sure nothing else gets attention. If you’d like a more specific example of how AI gets hyped up with bogus disinformation, last year CSIS (the Center for Strategic and International Studies) reported to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence about the future of technology in the intelligence community. They pointed to how next-gen technology (all of which are rife with fraud) will change the nature of national security concerns, with AI being the first listed:

When everything is a priority, nothing is. It can be too tempting to chase every new technology and start a thousand pilot programs, rather than focus on a few key priorities and make real progress. Our research has identified technologies that are critical to U.S. success in strategic competition, across the intelligence and defense enterprise. Five of them are especially consequential tools for the intelligence community: Artificial intelligence (AI), quantum technology, space-based technologies, high-efficiency batteries, and bioengineering.

Here’s what the average Military Industrial Complex mouthpiece wants Baby Boomers to think 2030 will look like:

This is the kind of manipulation that keeps investors dumping billions into a struggling, legally-dubious industry. For stupid, greedy, selfish Baby Boomers who grew up watching The Jetsons and noticed that none of it came to pass in their lifetimes, they will gladly sacrifice mankind on the altar of their retirement accounts, with the (false) promise of replacing workers with robots being a good enough lie to part with their dollars. But smarter people need experts to weigh in and say gibberish about military intelligence and Chinese robot armies, as if it’s a new Cold War. This hype in turn provides the political cover necessary to overlook all of the “flawed” or “problematic growing pains” of the industry, like mass theft.

Put another way, the “bright future” of AI needs to be bright enough to blind regulators to the reality of present-day violations.

Deadline to Digital ID

If it were not a specially protected project of the Military Industrial Complex, generative AI would have been dead in the water from its earliest days due to its blatant copyright violations and dishonest practices. Today it stands as a million class action lawsuits waiting to happen, as artists, designers, authors, and content creators recognize that their stuff has been stolen and nobody’s doing anything about it. The non-generative applications of AI are far less impressive, as it continues to misunderstand topics, forget what it was talking about, and cost way too many resources to operate. Although DeepSeek can run on a small server rack, it’s not even close to being capable of managing professional-scale projects, especially not consistently. Aside from hobbyists, the only people who are getting their money’s worth from AI today are cheaters, liars, and scammers who want to trick people by seeming smart or creating junk. And that’s the strategy. By refusing to regulate AI, the social engineers can create a crisis of distrust, danger, and disinformation online that seems impossible to disentangle from the “real Internet.”

The New York Times is actually suing OpenAI for copyright violation, and so far it doesn’t look like the “fair use” argument is going to get them out of it. Thankfully for OpenAI, the legal system is slow. And we can’t hope for lawsuits to fix anything anyway. Litigating a trillion-dollar industry that happens to be the only growing sector of the economy means the consequences will be localized to whatever company is found guilty, and even that will be minimized to keep them in the game. The circus will continue. You’d have to have smoking gun proof that they violated specific laws, or have a whistleblower confession, or have enough money to fight them in court for years and discover the evidence through legal proceedings. But since they’re already murdering whistleblowers who come out to expose them, they know exactly how precarious their position is, and the elite are turning helping to cover it up. If corporations and grieved parties can’t achieve satisfaction in traditional lawsuits, they will have no choice but to run to the government and lobby for regulation of the Internet itself. The ability to upload content will be restricted to “trusted partners” and even leaving comments will be limited to “Real ID” or “Digital ID” participants.

Yes, Millennials have collectively proven that it is worth it for the elite to spend trillions of dollars to pull off the murder of the free and open Internet. They never liked it, and now they need it to be reigned in more than ever. The exposure of Israel’s crimes against America and the world, or Elon Musk being a total fraud, or a dozen other PSYOPS and conspiracies on any given month, cost them more than that in long-term damage control. We have the power, today, to make their lives miserable and keep them paranoid day and night. Bible-believing Christians in particular are a thorn in their side, because we even call out their “Golden Age” theosophy, New Age nonsense, and Luciferian mysticism, which is supposed to be the antidote to the old system of corruption in their Hegelian Dialectic. Millennials were supposed to abandon religion altogether and embrace the science fiction mysticism of Marvel Comics, Alex Jones, and David Icke, looking forward to our own “Tony Stark” named Elon Musk.

Final thought

In response to this growing demand for AI regulation, I recently heard some pseudo-intellectual shills argue that LLMs are “a genie you can’t put back in the bottle” and “essentially just math, and you can’t ban math,” etc. but this is disingenuous. That’s like saying you can’t regulate cars because you can’t ban rubber circles or combustible liquids. The government wouldn’t need to ban math, algorithms, or chat bots in order to regulate AI services. They would simply need to define AI broadly, in a common sense way, and then pass laws which prohibits them, or demand that they be 100% transparent in their training models, or change how “fair use” rules applies to them.

As we hurdle toward biometric Digital ID enslavement, just remember that none of this was a natural course of events. This is all a response to our usage of the Internet to make the world a better place. It is a testament to how much ass we kicked, as the first and last generation to experience the World Wide Web in its natural form.