The idea that this is a fake hit is utterly risible. Only a highly biased observer with zero experience using firearms could think that the shooting was staged. You can literally watch the video of the assassination attempt and see the 5.56mm sized hole appear in Trump's ear.
I saw the rfk angle also. These theatrics have done much to lionize trump among the wobblers and help shift his persona from meme to hero (“We shall supply them one”- A.Pike). Stealing momentum from rfk jr is certainly a part of that. Cheers Terry. God bless you.
That’s interestingI… i just assumed it came from Morals and Dogma? Perhaps thats a fake book? Wouldn’t surprise me. Regardless, i am pleased to agree with our mutual friend James Delingpole who has readily supplied me with a means of dealing with this revelation in his timely article released days before the assassination attempt titled b…b…but he said the thing i wanted to hear: “ It really doesn’t matter whether or not 33rd degree freemason Albert Pike said “Whenever the people need a hero we shall supply him.” Even if he didn’t say it, the method described is ubiquitous to the point of cliche.” Cheers Terry. I have enjoyed quite a lot of your work. -tanner
I've read Morals & Dogma and there is no such quote there. A lot of fake quotes from Pike come from a supposed letter he wrote at the end of his life to some Italian general, same as the fake quote about the three World Wars. There is no evidence that Pike was the leader of a grand political conspiracy, that's what the Catholic Church wanted to push to deflect from their own obvious political schemes coming from the Vatican and the Jesuits. You're right, there is certainly a whole breed of social engineer who fulfill that quote! And since the death of Pike, I believe the Masons have been ever more absorbed into that machine, so they're probably no different than the others.
It’s the research and brilliant distillations of curious and absorbent minds like yours which allow me to ponder these topics; much less, discuss them…at all. Thank you Terry.
The fact that Trump is "not a very good actor" is actually strong reason to believe this was a genuine attempt on his life, as he doesn't give so much as a hint in the footage that this is a staged event.
By your own admission, he is not a very good actor; yet his 'performance' that day was so convincing that it has 'fooled' the vast majority of the people of the world - regardless of their politics and their personal opinion of him.
Thankfully I don't pretend to be Jesus. If I did, I would know the truth of every situation, and every person's hearts. I would also be be busy fulfilling Jewish prophecies, directly channeling messages from the Father, and probably changing the topic to much more important things than American politics.
I'm entitled to disbelieve the mainstream narrative and to rebuff attempts to goad me into playing along with psyops, don't you agree? And in general, I don't think I should have to feign sympathy for a lying criminal billionaire who selfishly destroyed millions of lives with his illegal lockdowns. Do you think Jesus was shedding tears for Jeffery Epstein when he was "killed" (if he actually died)? I'd rather be on guard against the next phase of his messianic martyr act than give the biggest liars in the world the benefit of the doubt.
Genuine Christians "have the Spirit of Christ". Those who are .walking. with the Lord are made more and more Christlike. Mature Christians have "the mind of Christ". If someone who claims to be a disciple of Christ does *not* exhibit the same Spirit as Christ had (i.e. if they don't .remind. us of Christ in the way they handle themselves - especially in .public. when they should be on their v best behaviour) then something is badly wrong.
P.S. I note the way you imply that U.S. politics is a relatively unimportant topic and then proceed to make a big fuss about Trump's political acts.
Fooling the "vast majority of people of the world" is easy when they're hypnotized by mass media (including 'Alt-Right' media) and political theater. They also fooled the 'vast majority' into injecting themselves with poison.
I take your point. But millions of people in the UK alone were able to recognise that the Covid jabs were something to be avoided; and more than 2 years after the first jabs were authorised, the WHO reckoned more than 30% of the world hadn't taken a single dose. I'm not sure the "vast majority of the people of the world" were so taken in that they accepted the death shot...
...and I am absolutely *POSITIVE* that the "vast majority" of those who support Trump or who hold to a similar worldview were not fooled re the jabs.
When Teddy Roosevelt was shot during his speech, he continued despite the possibility of there being more shooters. Also, the SS called out that the shooter was down and it was clear.
Calling out that the shooter was down is a reference to the known shooter. They don't know who else could be waiting, and obviously they screwed up the entire screening process before that. Also, veterans familiar with Secret Service protocol and military analysts who know about VIP protection have agreed that it was insane to be pumping his fist and standing up like that, and that his security allowed him to do it.
By your logic, if it was truly all clear, why DIDN'T he pull a Teddy Roosevelt and continue the speech? If it was 100% clear, then there were no possibility of extra threats and he should have stayed! It was only his ear that supposedly got grazed by a bullet, so why did they slowly and clumsily pull him away while stopping to let him take photos? Either treat it like a threat, or don't. But if it's kayfabe for the cameras, then what they did makes perfect sense.
1) Until you find yourself in a comparable political situation to the one Trump is in, and until you've personally been shot in the head, you may want to hold off in terms of judging how a person like Trump would react in such circums.
2) You appear to be assuming that Trump's immediate bodyguards were USSS, but Trump (wisely) doesn't trust the USSS, and he was employing other guards - i.e. ones who are not necessarily experts in VIP protection, or ones who were willing to follow his orders.
3) The probable reason Trump didn't continue his speech was because he may potentially have received other wounds he wasn't aware of - just as happened to Reagan when he was shot.
I've revised my hypotheses from your last article and I have some criticisms against your take this time. The idea that there wasn't a bullet that hit Trump at all is very hard for me to believe, mostly due to the physical reaction of Trump on the 1st and 2nd shots. That doesn't mean I fully believe the shooter is who the media says he is or that there was only ever one shooter in the first place. If the shooter is really the man on the roof in the gun influencer shirt, I think it's 70% likely that he was a good marksman actually aiming for Trump's ear. This would only require a few people to be in on the conspiracy.
If there was a second shooter approximately in the same location (hidden in a building, I suppose), it would require maybe a dozen people to be in on the conspiracy. I don't see hardly anyone talking about this, but maybe that's because it's true.
And the third most likely hypothesis is that it seriously was a crazy kid that was trying to kill Trump and Trump got lucky. Perhaps you don't realize how insane many Americans are these days. There is so much support from college-educated progressives for this shooter because his actions are not unconscionable in the eyes of maybe tens of thousands of other Americans. This violence is a reasonable product of media/school brainwashing alone.
1st Hypothesis faith is 40% - shooter isn't the kid the media says he is.
2nd Hypothesis faith is 30% - there was a second shooter and investigators are in on it.
3rd Hypothesis faith is 30% - it actually was a crazy kid trying to kill Trump, but failed.
I disagree with the ideas that Trump himself was in on it, the SS injured him when he was covered by them, or that the blood was fake. You may think Trump a liar, but I don't think he is the kind to go this far. He strikes me as more of an opportunist that quickly realized how beneficial this was for him and took advantage of the situation. The SS causing the bloody injury seems harder to stage than the trained marksman aiming for his ear on purpose. All the people nearby Trump would've been in on the conspiracy as well. So many HQ phone cameras on him would've been very hard to hide from.
From my American POV, RKF Jr. does not seem to have any significant support. I've never met anyone who talks about his actions or what he says. The chance he is also controlled opposition is high too. The idea that "Trump is terrified of RFK Jr." seems very outlandish. Other than the few ten thousands of conspiracy theorists in America, no one seems to care about RFK Jr. at all.
A final note on the intentions of the Syndicate: I believe the Syndicate wants chaos in America and an "assassination attempt" still seems beneficial for that purpose. This could've been setup by both groups in my eyes. Perhaps the syndicate only wants Trump to gather as much support as possible before actually assassinating him. The SS would be more on the Syndicate's side than the Pentagon's, right?
I appreciate the comment. Of course I could be totally wrong. I'm going to continue developing my theory, since what I've seen is not convincing to me at all, but I like to hear other theories and arguments.
As for RFK Jr., he's being actively suppressed by the media and pollsters so his "buzz" is low unless you know where to look. Behind the scenes his numbers are blowing away any other independent in modern memory and he has done the calculations on getting enough delegates to win if the Reps and Dems are fairly close. RFK has been pushed out of the public discourse and kept off the debate stage to make him seem like a non-candidate, while Trump is constantly getting unlimited free press once again.
And looking at your options, I find your hypothesis far more radical than my own. That degree of "luck" should never be the default assumption to explain something, I'd say. To me it's like believing the 9/11 narrative at face value because it's hard to believe such awful things could be done by insiders, or that they'd be able to pull off such a huge crime without a bunch of insiders coming out and exposing it. In other words, they've done much more insane things before and gotten away with it.
Yes, I know there are elite snipers who can snipe an ant from 2000 yards away, etc. but if any faction wanted to help Trump by having a real shot at his head, the risk of accidentally killing him, or exposing the real sniper in the process, would mean it's truly a black op team doing their best work within US soil in broad daylight. Nobody outside of that team could be trusted with it. But meanwhile, there is the supposed shooter facing the counter-sniper team, so where do they fit in? And why were security measures so bad? The two don't line up. So now we're talking about a miraculous shot by an elite sniper or an even more miraculous shot by a kid who didn't even have a scope on his rifle. I'm not buying either.
Thanks for the detailed response, I hope people who read the article will also read your comments, it makes your reasoning much clearer. I have to say your instincts to distrust such a politically convenient event like this are correct, even if we have different ideas about how it was staged. I still think there's a 30% chance it was a real assassination attempt, but regardless, the beast will get what it is destined to.
As for RFK Jr, it does seem like he has more support than I thought. I believe you that he is being actively suppressed, but at the same time I think he's being supported by some in the deep state and foreign interests. (he seems like a serious supporter of Israel [despite calling himself anti-war], from the little I've read)
RFK does have some red flags, but he's also corrected himself on some big issues like carbon controls. A good leader should be able to pivot when they learn more. For now, I'd assume he's compromised by Israel somehow.
IDK why you'd bother. Maybe you haven't heard, but Trump is now pro-abortion, pro-war, pro-marijuana, and he's essentially pro-immigration, I literally couldn't care less if the assassination attempt was real or fake (it's certainly fake). Also, I'm a bitter American, the last thing I want to hear is two disorganized Europeans ramble about American politics for two hours. (No offense to you, of course - I also just hate podcasts)
I can’t believe I actually read through this garbage. I think I was hoping there would be a punch line, and I guess there was, turn to God and stay out of it is your message? Is that what you think God wants us to do? Turn your back on evil and pray evil doesn’t catch up to you? God helps those who help themselves. If you want to know what God really wants us to do in the face of Evil, I would suggest reading the Old Testament. A Bible version that still actually uses the word Evil.
Actually, we don't just pray that evil doesn't catch up to us, we prepare for tribulation like the apostles. They rejoiced when they were attacked because they were counted worthy to suffer for Christ
The logic actually makes sense to me. I am amused by DJT but there are too many red flags to ignore that he's not what he seems. RFK has much to offer but appears to actually think govt is the solution. Sigh.
I will vote, though it will make no difference in my "fix is in" state. I pray your vote matters, because that means I'm wrong, and this election is all real.
My vote won’t count for much either. I live amongst the insane. I do what I can in other ways. The only red flags I’m aware of is what Madstreaming Media wants you to believe. Not saying he’s perfect, but is being rough around the edges a red flag to you? His bombastic personality? His ego? We’re talking about being on the precipice of a one world government trending toward depopulation, de-farming , de-livestock, mandates, vaxing, pro Marxist corporatist cabal ruled by Dumbasses. I’ll take imperfect Trump over that any day.
Your line of reasoning is pretty much a perfect description of how pro wrestling storylines are developed. They build up a bad guy so that he is the most obnoxious, hateful character you've ever seen, and then they introduce the flawed hero who takes them on and saves the day. The game is to get you to invest in their storyline.
Just to clarify, the red flags I see have less than nothing to do with his persona. I refer to Operation Warpspeed and allowing the shutdown of small business America, but also failures to expose the secrets of the military and intelligence communities over the last decades, and the shady "above the law" activities of international bankers." Trump at best played ball with these people. At worst he is one of them.
I completely understand. It is hugely frustrating that Trump didn't do more in his first term to deal with the Swamp and the Deep State generally. However, my guess is that he felt his priority in his *first* term needed to be to get the country back on track financially and internationally, not least to ensure he'd get a .second. term where he could go nuts. This situation has some parallels with JFK who kept back his more radical steps for his, er, second term.
As for the whole Covid thing, I reckon the powers-that-be threw .everything. they had at duping Trump here. I can't see him coming out with some of the things he did - including his remarks on HCQ - if he were "one of them". But this is where it becomes so vital to take his persona into account. His terrible stance on the jabs could have been due to a blindspot from God, or from an awful lot of hubris on his part. But his persona tells you he's sincere.
The idea that this is a fake hit is utterly risible. Only a highly biased observer with zero experience using firearms could think that the shooting was staged. You can literally watch the video of the assassination attempt and see the 5.56mm sized hole appear in Trump's ear.
I can LITERALLY watch VIDEO of a STAGED PERFORMANCE? WOW!
This Comments section is like a scene from "Carry on Ducking" :o(
Except Sid James would have been more gracious.
I saw the rfk angle also. These theatrics have done much to lionize trump among the wobblers and help shift his persona from meme to hero (“We shall supply them one”- A.Pike). Stealing momentum from rfk jr is certainly a part of that. Cheers Terry. God bless you.
Thank you!
I do have to mention, however, that I think that quote from Albert Pike is from a hoax document.
That’s interestingI… i just assumed it came from Morals and Dogma? Perhaps thats a fake book? Wouldn’t surprise me. Regardless, i am pleased to agree with our mutual friend James Delingpole who has readily supplied me with a means of dealing with this revelation in his timely article released days before the assassination attempt titled b…b…but he said the thing i wanted to hear: “ It really doesn’t matter whether or not 33rd degree freemason Albert Pike said “Whenever the people need a hero we shall supply him.” Even if he didn’t say it, the method described is ubiquitous to the point of cliche.” Cheers Terry. I have enjoyed quite a lot of your work. -tanner
I've read Morals & Dogma and there is no such quote there. A lot of fake quotes from Pike come from a supposed letter he wrote at the end of his life to some Italian general, same as the fake quote about the three World Wars. There is no evidence that Pike was the leader of a grand political conspiracy, that's what the Catholic Church wanted to push to deflect from their own obvious political schemes coming from the Vatican and the Jesuits. You're right, there is certainly a whole breed of social engineer who fulfill that quote! And since the death of Pike, I believe the Masons have been ever more absorbed into that machine, so they're probably no different than the others.
It’s the research and brilliant distillations of curious and absorbent minds like yours which allow me to ponder these topics; much less, discuss them…at all. Thank you Terry.
They tell us everything in Wag the Dog about the theatre that is politics
Interesting, Terry, and right on target.
To MissLadyK -- read Revelation and Terry Wolf's books. I'll pray for you!
I’ve read Revelation and have studied it extensively. But thanks for the advice.
The fact that Trump is "not a very good actor" is actually strong reason to believe this was a genuine attempt on his life, as he doesn't give so much as a hint in the footage that this is a staged event.
So the fist pumping and exposing himself to other possible shooters for the camera didn't give you any hints?
No.
By your own admission, he is not a very good actor; yet his 'performance' that day was so convincing that it has 'fooled' the vast majority of the people of the world - regardless of their politics and their personal opinion of him.
Alrighty. It was pretty pathetic acting to me. It will be funny to see how his reputation skyrockets after this stunt either way.
"It will be funny to see how his reputation skyrockets after this stunt either way."
Just what Christ would have said if He'd been in your shoes. You 2 must be very close.
Thankfully I don't pretend to be Jesus. If I did, I would know the truth of every situation, and every person's hearts. I would also be be busy fulfilling Jewish prophecies, directly channeling messages from the Father, and probably changing the topic to much more important things than American politics.
I'm entitled to disbelieve the mainstream narrative and to rebuff attempts to goad me into playing along with psyops, don't you agree? And in general, I don't think I should have to feign sympathy for a lying criminal billionaire who selfishly destroyed millions of lives with his illegal lockdowns. Do you think Jesus was shedding tears for Jeffery Epstein when he was "killed" (if he actually died)? I'd rather be on guard against the next phase of his messianic martyr act than give the biggest liars in the world the benefit of the doubt.
I'm afraid you are seriously missing the point.
Genuine Christians "have the Spirit of Christ". Those who are .walking. with the Lord are made more and more Christlike. Mature Christians have "the mind of Christ". If someone who claims to be a disciple of Christ does *not* exhibit the same Spirit as Christ had (i.e. if they don't .remind. us of Christ in the way they handle themselves - especially in .public. when they should be on their v best behaviour) then something is badly wrong.
P.S. I note the way you imply that U.S. politics is a relatively unimportant topic and then proceed to make a big fuss about Trump's political acts.
You should listen to this podcast where Ole Dammagard breaks the whole assassination theatre down. It’s top class. https://www.podbean.com/ea/pb-kkvwv-16a8467
Fooling the "vast majority of people of the world" is easy when they're hypnotized by mass media (including 'Alt-Right' media) and political theater. They also fooled the 'vast majority' into injecting themselves with poison.
I take your point. But millions of people in the UK alone were able to recognise that the Covid jabs were something to be avoided; and more than 2 years after the first jabs were authorised, the WHO reckoned more than 30% of the world hadn't taken a single dose. I'm not sure the "vast majority of the people of the world" were so taken in that they accepted the death shot...
...and I am absolutely *POSITIVE* that the "vast majority" of those who support Trump or who hold to a similar worldview were not fooled re the jabs.
Why do they?
Well that's clear then.
When Teddy Roosevelt was shot during his speech, he continued despite the possibility of there being more shooters. Also, the SS called out that the shooter was down and it was clear.
Calling out that the shooter was down is a reference to the known shooter. They don't know who else could be waiting, and obviously they screwed up the entire screening process before that. Also, veterans familiar with Secret Service protocol and military analysts who know about VIP protection have agreed that it was insane to be pumping his fist and standing up like that, and that his security allowed him to do it.
By your logic, if it was truly all clear, why DIDN'T he pull a Teddy Roosevelt and continue the speech? If it was 100% clear, then there were no possibility of extra threats and he should have stayed! It was only his ear that supposedly got grazed by a bullet, so why did they slowly and clumsily pull him away while stopping to let him take photos? Either treat it like a threat, or don't. But if it's kayfabe for the cameras, then what they did makes perfect sense.
1) Until you find yourself in a comparable political situation to the one Trump is in, and until you've personally been shot in the head, you may want to hold off in terms of judging how a person like Trump would react in such circums.
2) You appear to be assuming that Trump's immediate bodyguards were USSS, but Trump (wisely) doesn't trust the USSS, and he was employing other guards - i.e. ones who are not necessarily experts in VIP protection, or ones who were willing to follow his orders.
3) The probable reason Trump didn't continue his speech was because he may potentially have received other wounds he wasn't aware of - just as happened to Reagan when he was shot.
For some reason, the software won't allow me to "Like" this comment.
So, I'll just say, "Well said, sir. Why am I not surprised you've had no response from his nibs?"
It was a staged hoax and of course Trump was in on it. If they wanted him dead, he'd be dead already.
I repeat. Does God not get a say in this?
Does Almighty God not have any say n the matter?
One other participant in the staged event - a British photographer who fraudulently helped substantiate the bullet photograph. Evidence here:
https://peteryim.substack.com/p/reference-bullet-photograph-fabricated
Thank goodness im not paying for this utter drivel
Many thanks for this! It was so nice to be able to end my day's foray into Wolfe's , er, ideas, with a giggle.
Sorry for HUGE comment, lol.
I've revised my hypotheses from your last article and I have some criticisms against your take this time. The idea that there wasn't a bullet that hit Trump at all is very hard for me to believe, mostly due to the physical reaction of Trump on the 1st and 2nd shots. That doesn't mean I fully believe the shooter is who the media says he is or that there was only ever one shooter in the first place. If the shooter is really the man on the roof in the gun influencer shirt, I think it's 70% likely that he was a good marksman actually aiming for Trump's ear. This would only require a few people to be in on the conspiracy.
If there was a second shooter approximately in the same location (hidden in a building, I suppose), it would require maybe a dozen people to be in on the conspiracy. I don't see hardly anyone talking about this, but maybe that's because it's true.
And the third most likely hypothesis is that it seriously was a crazy kid that was trying to kill Trump and Trump got lucky. Perhaps you don't realize how insane many Americans are these days. There is so much support from college-educated progressives for this shooter because his actions are not unconscionable in the eyes of maybe tens of thousands of other Americans. This violence is a reasonable product of media/school brainwashing alone.
1st Hypothesis faith is 40% - shooter isn't the kid the media says he is.
2nd Hypothesis faith is 30% - there was a second shooter and investigators are in on it.
3rd Hypothesis faith is 30% - it actually was a crazy kid trying to kill Trump, but failed.
I disagree with the ideas that Trump himself was in on it, the SS injured him when he was covered by them, or that the blood was fake. You may think Trump a liar, but I don't think he is the kind to go this far. He strikes me as more of an opportunist that quickly realized how beneficial this was for him and took advantage of the situation. The SS causing the bloody injury seems harder to stage than the trained marksman aiming for his ear on purpose. All the people nearby Trump would've been in on the conspiracy as well. So many HQ phone cameras on him would've been very hard to hide from.
From my American POV, RKF Jr. does not seem to have any significant support. I've never met anyone who talks about his actions or what he says. The chance he is also controlled opposition is high too. The idea that "Trump is terrified of RFK Jr." seems very outlandish. Other than the few ten thousands of conspiracy theorists in America, no one seems to care about RFK Jr. at all.
A final note on the intentions of the Syndicate: I believe the Syndicate wants chaos in America and an "assassination attempt" still seems beneficial for that purpose. This could've been setup by both groups in my eyes. Perhaps the syndicate only wants Trump to gather as much support as possible before actually assassinating him. The SS would be more on the Syndicate's side than the Pentagon's, right?
I appreciate the comment. Of course I could be totally wrong. I'm going to continue developing my theory, since what I've seen is not convincing to me at all, but I like to hear other theories and arguments.
As for RFK Jr., he's being actively suppressed by the media and pollsters so his "buzz" is low unless you know where to look. Behind the scenes his numbers are blowing away any other independent in modern memory and he has done the calculations on getting enough delegates to win if the Reps and Dems are fairly close. RFK has been pushed out of the public discourse and kept off the debate stage to make him seem like a non-candidate, while Trump is constantly getting unlimited free press once again.
And looking at your options, I find your hypothesis far more radical than my own. That degree of "luck" should never be the default assumption to explain something, I'd say. To me it's like believing the 9/11 narrative at face value because it's hard to believe such awful things could be done by insiders, or that they'd be able to pull off such a huge crime without a bunch of insiders coming out and exposing it. In other words, they've done much more insane things before and gotten away with it.
Yes, I know there are elite snipers who can snipe an ant from 2000 yards away, etc. but if any faction wanted to help Trump by having a real shot at his head, the risk of accidentally killing him, or exposing the real sniper in the process, would mean it's truly a black op team doing their best work within US soil in broad daylight. Nobody outside of that team could be trusted with it. But meanwhile, there is the supposed shooter facing the counter-sniper team, so where do they fit in? And why were security measures so bad? The two don't line up. So now we're talking about a miraculous shot by an elite sniper or an even more miraculous shot by a kid who didn't even have a scope on his rifle. I'm not buying either.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/investigations/2024/07/16/trump-shooting-assassination-gun-details/74425138007/
Thanks for the detailed response, I hope people who read the article will also read your comments, it makes your reasoning much clearer. I have to say your instincts to distrust such a politically convenient event like this are correct, even if we have different ideas about how it was staged. I still think there's a 30% chance it was a real assassination attempt, but regardless, the beast will get what it is destined to.
As for RFK Jr, it does seem like he has more support than I thought. I believe you that he is being actively suppressed, but at the same time I think he's being supported by some in the deep state and foreign interests. (he seems like a serious supporter of Israel [despite calling himself anti-war], from the little I've read)
RFK does have some red flags, but he's also corrected himself on some big issues like carbon controls. A good leader should be able to pivot when they learn more. For now, I'd assume he's compromised by Israel somehow.
Charles please listen to this. It’s illuminating https://www.podbean.com/ea/pb-kkvwv-16a8467
IDK why you'd bother. Maybe you haven't heard, but Trump is now pro-abortion, pro-war, pro-marijuana, and he's essentially pro-immigration, I literally couldn't care less if the assassination attempt was real or fake (it's certainly fake). Also, I'm a bitter American, the last thing I want to hear is two disorganized Europeans ramble about American politics for two hours. (No offense to you, of course - I also just hate podcasts)
🤣🤣🤣🤣 I got you Charles!
I can’t believe I actually read through this garbage. I think I was hoping there would be a punch line, and I guess there was, turn to God and stay out of it is your message? Is that what you think God wants us to do? Turn your back on evil and pray evil doesn’t catch up to you? God helps those who help themselves. If you want to know what God really wants us to do in the face of Evil, I would suggest reading the Old Testament. A Bible version that still actually uses the word Evil.
Actually, we don't just pray that evil doesn't catch up to us, we prepare for tribulation like the apostles. They rejoiced when they were attacked because they were counted worthy to suffer for Christ
Your hypothesis is as good any to prepare you for tribulation. I wish you well.
The logic actually makes sense to me. I am amused by DJT but there are too many red flags to ignore that he's not what he seems. RFK has much to offer but appears to actually think govt is the solution. Sigh.
I will vote, though it will make no difference in my "fix is in" state. I pray your vote matters, because that means I'm wrong, and this election is all real.
My vote won’t count for much either. I live amongst the insane. I do what I can in other ways. The only red flags I’m aware of is what Madstreaming Media wants you to believe. Not saying he’s perfect, but is being rough around the edges a red flag to you? His bombastic personality? His ego? We’re talking about being on the precipice of a one world government trending toward depopulation, de-farming , de-livestock, mandates, vaxing, pro Marxist corporatist cabal ruled by Dumbasses. I’ll take imperfect Trump over that any day.
Your line of reasoning is pretty much a perfect description of how pro wrestling storylines are developed. They build up a bad guy so that he is the most obnoxious, hateful character you've ever seen, and then they introduce the flawed hero who takes them on and saves the day. The game is to get you to invest in their storyline.
Very well said, MissLadyK.
Obviously Trump had a massive blindspot re the jabs, but he is so obviously sincere that I find it very telling when people rubbish him.
Just to clarify, the red flags I see have less than nothing to do with his persona. I refer to Operation Warpspeed and allowing the shutdown of small business America, but also failures to expose the secrets of the military and intelligence communities over the last decades, and the shady "above the law" activities of international bankers." Trump at best played ball with these people. At worst he is one of them.
It gives me no pleasure to conclude that.
I completely understand. It is hugely frustrating that Trump didn't do more in his first term to deal with the Swamp and the Deep State generally. However, my guess is that he felt his priority in his *first* term needed to be to get the country back on track financially and internationally, not least to ensure he'd get a .second. term where he could go nuts. This situation has some parallels with JFK who kept back his more radical steps for his, er, second term.
As for the whole Covid thing, I reckon the powers-that-be threw .everything. they had at duping Trump here. I can't see him coming out with some of the things he did - including his remarks on HCQ - if he were "one of them". But this is where it becomes so vital to take his persona into account. His terrible stance on the jabs could have been due to a blindspot from God, or from an awful lot of hubris on his part. But his persona tells you he's sincere.
Calling Trump sincere because of his persona is hilarious.