And with the rise of transhumanism, there may well be a push by the powers that shouldn’t be to convince humans to embrace death and upload their minds into computer to save the earth. We are witnessing the final stages of mankind abandoning the Word of God and going mad.
I am a Catholic, and I don’t think your painting of the Jesuit order is entirely accurate. You’ve understood a lot of the bad, but not the good of what it has been at times. Anyway though, the bad is certainly bad enough, worse than you have described, and something I think you may be blind to is apostate jesuits (and followers of inverted versions of all (?) of the other orders) roles in each of these occurrences. You really really really need to look into what is going on with the “synod on synodality” that the vatican has been putting on since Francis took power, and which is now continuing with Leo. They just put out a “final document” which isnt really final, but it lays out how theyre going to be implementing a “new church”. Assuming this goes forward, this is the Ape of the Church that Abp. Fulton Sheen spoke so eloquently about, drawing heavily on the exegesis work of Cardinal Manning. The synod put out a very specific timeline culminating in 2028 a few days ago. If you look into this I think a whole lot of things will click for you. Anthony Stine has decently balanced coverage of it.
It has all the trad catholics and a bunch of Orthodox who know about it extremely concerned, because it has literally never happened before. Regardless of how one views the RCC, something like it has never happened in the RCC. You’ll also maybe find Malachi Martin’s commentary on the matter interesting as well.
In it, I analyse all the panels of that infamous mural that sits at the UN Security Council. It is quite remarkable as a whole and in its collective panels.
The panel that has the Pale Horse (that is the only horse in the entire murall) has two other parts to it. But my interpretation of the pale horse is as follows (what I previously wrote):
"Here, not only does it means death to humans (such as from war and pandemics), but also death to sovereign nations, cultural identity, family, and the like."
"In summary, it’s really indicative of the elite’s desire to bring about massive depopulation."
I also expand on the other two elements of the panel which consist of science (woman using microscope) and astrology, not astronomy which we could easily be led to believe, depicted by a man with a telescope looking into the heavens.
Here is what I wrote about these two other parts in that panel:
The upper part of the panel shows a white man and white woman engaged in scientific pursuits.
The male-female pair are white for a reason: they represent the “pure race” as envisaged by the ruling eugenicists.
The woman using the microscope represents the “science” (read pseudoscience) that eugenicists have been using to attempt to justify the sterilisation or outright extermination of the classes they deem inferior such as blacks, as well as those born with infirmities.
...
The man in the panel is looking through a telescope. At prima facie, the viewer is to think about astronomy. But in fact, it is about astrology.
The billionaire and trillionaire classes who founded the United Nations espouse the dark arts which includes astrology.
In Part 2 of my Synagogue of Satan series, I referenced a quote from J.P. Morgan to this effect:
"Millionaires don't use Astrology, billionaires do."
...
Though the white man and woman in this part of the panel appear to represent genuine science, it is really scientism that they are espousing and practising.
We’ve seen this ideology in its full glory during the Covid-19 Scamdemic.
Since the mid- to late-nineteenth century, scientific pursuits have excluded God – or the Creator, whichever you prefer – from inquiry. Gone were the days of greats like Isaac Newton.
Even the brilliant wordsmith Edgar Allan Poe foresaw this and attempted to warn us about it – particularly in his elusive, but outstanding work called Eureka (PDF book here).
This is further substantiated in the opposing panel on the far left of the mural which also shows only members of a pure white race and a church steeple without the cross.
Remember, the god they worship is Lucifer (Satan) who is the destroyer. They wish to destroy everything that is good and holy, especially God’s most precious creation – children. God is the creator.
[END OF MY EXCERPT]
I think a lot of these elements which I wrote about align with some of those you have in this post. The billionaire class are indeed into these dark occult arts and have a grand desire to play God themselves, albeit on a darker, more Satanic, level. That is how they yield their power.
For myself, the methods of the elite are covered pretty well by other researchers, who are always analyzing it. That's why I tend to gravitate to talking about Israel's role, the Green Agenda, and the order of events we should expect regarding the Tribulation.
Great stuff...for rabbit holes on "other researchers" Elizabeth Nickson and James Delingpole are going down this path. My interpretation, not her words but it seems that Elizabeth through her background, has lived amongst them
I had a great podcast interview on James Delingpole's podcast, where I was able to explain my views on this. He already knew that the Green Agenda was a deception, but I helped him think of it more in prophetic terms. It's great to have more people aware of this danger.
We can't stop these things from happening, but we can prevent people from falling for their lies.
I will certainly have to check out that document! Thanks for sharing it.
From my research, the early Jesuits were largely "conversos" which is not purely Jewish, but a Catholicized Jewish mixed race, neither truly Catholic or Jewish. And what Disraeli was referring to was a comparison, that "the first Jesuits were Jews" doesn't make sense these days because the Jesuits aren't known to be hugely influential, but what he was trying to say is that the Jews were the original social activists, I think.
It is often suggested that conversos were outwardly Christian but retained their Jewish beliefs in secret. This would be consistent with
(a) the fact that the conversion was not a free choice in the first place
(b) the doctrine that permitted such deception
I have also read that the Alumbrado belief system was highly Kabbalistic - which then draws the direct line from Judaism -> crypto-Jew/converso Alumbrado -> Jesuits.
I tend to disagree on your interpretation of Disraeli's statement:
(a) I think that the first Jesuits were actually Jewish as the book I linked to provides strong evidence for. It's worth noting that Loyola himself came from a converso family - and the other key founder was a relation (from memory - nephew) of the Borgia (Alexander VI?) pope. And that Borgia was himself Jewish was common knowledge/rumor at the time - and his behavior was of course consistent with what we see from occult kabbalist societies throughout history.
(b) whether Jesuits remain influential today is one question (and I do not necessarily agree that they are not), but that they were not influential at the time Disraeli wrote seems very questionable to me...
Quick further comment (which is intended to follow the one which starts "it is often suggested..." but may - or may not - end up appearing above it owing to the nature of substack's design or my lack of understanding thereof :-)
Here is the full passage from Coningsby:
"Yet the Jews, Coningsby, are essentially Tories. Toryism, indeed, is but copied from the mighty prototype which has fashioned Europe. And every generation they must become more powerful and more dangerous to the society which is hostile to them. Do you think that the quiet humdrum persecution of a decorous representative of an English university can crush those who have successively baffled the Pharaohs, Nebuchadnezzar, Rome, and the Feudal ages? The fact is, you cannot destroy a pure race of the Caucasian organisation. It is a physiological fact; a simple law of nature, which has baffled Egyptian and Assyrian Kings, Roman Emperors, and Christian Inquisitors. No penal laws, no physical tortures, can effect that a superior race should be absorbed in an inferior, or be destroyed by it. The mixed persecuting races disappear; the pure persecuted race remains. And at this moment, in spite of centuries, of tens of centuries, of degradation, the Jewish mind exercises a vast influence on the affairs of Europe. I speak not of their laws, which you still obey; of their literature, with which your minds are saturated; but of the living Hebrew intellect.
"'You never observe a great intellectual movement in Europe in which the Jews do not greatly participate. The first Jesuits were Jews; that mysterious Russian Diplomacy which so alarms Western Europe is organised and principally carried on by Jews; that mighty revolution which is at this moment preparing in Germany, and which will be, in fact, a second and greater Reformation, and of which so little is as yet known in England, is entirely developing under the auspices of Jews, who almost monopolise the professorial chairs of Germany. Neander, the founder of Spiritual Christianity, and who is Regius Professor of Divinity in the University of Berlin, is a Jew. Benary, equally famous, and in the same University, is a Jew. Wehl, the Arabic Professor of Heidelberg, is a Jew. Years ago, when I was In Palestine, I met a German student who was accumulating materials for the History of Christianity, and studying the genius of the place; a modest and learned man. It was Wehl; then unknown, since become the first Arabic scholar of the day, and the author of the life of Mahomet. But for the German professors of this race, their name is Legion. I think there are more than ten at Berlin alone."
It's pretty clear from the larger context that Disraeli intends his statements literally here - it's hard to read the whole passage and conclude that he's making a generic point about social activism - at least that's the way I read it.
I'll take that into consideration, I haven't made up my mind on the matter. Thank you. Also, my assumption comes from knowing about Kulturkampf under Otto von Bismarck. Once you understand what that was about, it's very easy to understand why "Jesuit" would have been synonymous with powerful political movements, subversion, assassination, and cunning. Jesuits were notorious for running things behind the scenes in Europe before WWI.
Well we're very much in agreement on the perfidy and power of the Jesuits!
The question pertains only as to exactly who they were, whom they served (if not themselves), and whether they were infiltratee as much as infiltrator.
Occult (kabbalistic) societies are specifically designed to be controlled by a tiny group or even a single entity whose true motives and goals are hidden from the rest of the group. Who controls who is an interesting exercise - my belief is Rothschilds currently rule - but of course they too are misled and controlled by Satan himself (for whom they reputedly lay a place at their dinner table - obviously I have no idea if this is true but it's definitely salacious :-)).
I am adding this article to my British Plandemonium graph. In particular, I can see why the Los Alumbrados would be raised in Spain, which took over through marriage after the Portugese opened trade around Africa into Asia.
And with the rise of transhumanism, there may well be a push by the powers that shouldn’t be to convince humans to embrace death and upload their minds into computer to save the earth. We are witnessing the final stages of mankind abandoning the Word of God and going mad.
I wonder if this helps: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B75yD6e-RzQEUEs0bTVCZXdtOEE/view?usp=sharing&resourcekey=0-wemvjmEjBkOfvjuDb-yuWw
I am a Catholic, and I don’t think your painting of the Jesuit order is entirely accurate. You’ve understood a lot of the bad, but not the good of what it has been at times. Anyway though, the bad is certainly bad enough, worse than you have described, and something I think you may be blind to is apostate jesuits (and followers of inverted versions of all (?) of the other orders) roles in each of these occurrences. You really really really need to look into what is going on with the “synod on synodality” that the vatican has been putting on since Francis took power, and which is now continuing with Leo. They just put out a “final document” which isnt really final, but it lays out how theyre going to be implementing a “new church”. Assuming this goes forward, this is the Ape of the Church that Abp. Fulton Sheen spoke so eloquently about, drawing heavily on the exegesis work of Cardinal Manning. The synod put out a very specific timeline culminating in 2028 a few days ago. If you look into this I think a whole lot of things will click for you. Anthony Stine has decently balanced coverage of it.
Thank you. I wasn't looking to dig deeper into this topic but I will now.
It has all the trad catholics and a bunch of Orthodox who know about it extremely concerned, because it has literally never happened before. Regardless of how one views the RCC, something like it has never happened in the RCC. You’ll also maybe find Malachi Martin’s commentary on the matter interesting as well.
More great writing Terry. Fascinating.
I had also written a bit about the PALE HORSE in my piece 'SYMBOL WATCH – The United Nations & UN Security Council Headquarters: War & Depopulation' (see https://fournier.substack.com/p/symbol-watch-the-united-nations-and).
In it, I analyse all the panels of that infamous mural that sits at the UN Security Council. It is quite remarkable as a whole and in its collective panels.
The panel that has the Pale Horse (that is the only horse in the entire murall) has two other parts to it. But my interpretation of the pale horse is as follows (what I previously wrote):
"Here, not only does it means death to humans (such as from war and pandemics), but also death to sovereign nations, cultural identity, family, and the like."
"In summary, it’s really indicative of the elite’s desire to bring about massive depopulation."
I also expand on the other two elements of the panel which consist of science (woman using microscope) and astrology, not astronomy which we could easily be led to believe, depicted by a man with a telescope looking into the heavens.
Here is what I wrote about these two other parts in that panel:
The upper part of the panel shows a white man and white woman engaged in scientific pursuits.
The male-female pair are white for a reason: they represent the “pure race” as envisaged by the ruling eugenicists.
The woman using the microscope represents the “science” (read pseudoscience) that eugenicists have been using to attempt to justify the sterilisation or outright extermination of the classes they deem inferior such as blacks, as well as those born with infirmities.
...
The man in the panel is looking through a telescope. At prima facie, the viewer is to think about astronomy. But in fact, it is about astrology.
The billionaire and trillionaire classes who founded the United Nations espouse the dark arts which includes astrology.
In Part 2 of my Synagogue of Satan series, I referenced a quote from J.P. Morgan to this effect:
"Millionaires don't use Astrology, billionaires do."
...
Though the white man and woman in this part of the panel appear to represent genuine science, it is really scientism that they are espousing and practising.
We’ve seen this ideology in its full glory during the Covid-19 Scamdemic.
Since the mid- to late-nineteenth century, scientific pursuits have excluded God – or the Creator, whichever you prefer – from inquiry. Gone were the days of greats like Isaac Newton.
Even the brilliant wordsmith Edgar Allan Poe foresaw this and attempted to warn us about it – particularly in his elusive, but outstanding work called Eureka (PDF book here).
This is further substantiated in the opposing panel on the far left of the mural which also shows only members of a pure white race and a church steeple without the cross.
Remember, the god they worship is Lucifer (Satan) who is the destroyer. They wish to destroy everything that is good and holy, especially God’s most precious creation – children. God is the creator.
[END OF MY EXCERPT]
I think a lot of these elements which I wrote about align with some of those you have in this post. The billionaire class are indeed into these dark occult arts and have a grand desire to play God themselves, albeit on a darker, more Satanic, level. That is how they yield their power.
Thoughts welcome.
Plenty of overlap, I agree.
For myself, the methods of the elite are covered pretty well by other researchers, who are always analyzing it. That's why I tend to gravitate to talking about Israel's role, the Green Agenda, and the order of events we should expect regarding the Tribulation.
Great stuff...for rabbit holes on "other researchers" Elizabeth Nickson and James Delingpole are going down this path. My interpretation, not her words but it seems that Elizabeth through her background, has lived amongst them
I had a great podcast interview on James Delingpole's podcast, where I was able to explain my views on this. He already knew that the Green Agenda was a deception, but I helped him think of it more in prophetic terms. It's great to have more people aware of this danger.
We can't stop these things from happening, but we can prevent people from falling for their lies.
I think your work is not complete without this quote, and some discussion of its implications:
"You never observe a great intellectual movement in Europe in which the Jews do not greatly participate. The first Jesuits were Jews."
Benjamin Disraeli ("Coningsby, etc”, p.183)
This book - although probably controlled opposition - provides quite a bit of interesting detail on the evidence that the earliest Jesuits were Jewish: https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/38170/9789047444114_webready_content_text.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
I will certainly have to check out that document! Thanks for sharing it.
From my research, the early Jesuits were largely "conversos" which is not purely Jewish, but a Catholicized Jewish mixed race, neither truly Catholic or Jewish. And what Disraeli was referring to was a comparison, that "the first Jesuits were Jews" doesn't make sense these days because the Jesuits aren't known to be hugely influential, but what he was trying to say is that the Jews were the original social activists, I think.
It is often suggested that conversos were outwardly Christian but retained their Jewish beliefs in secret. This would be consistent with
(a) the fact that the conversion was not a free choice in the first place
(b) the doctrine that permitted such deception
I have also read that the Alumbrado belief system was highly Kabbalistic - which then draws the direct line from Judaism -> crypto-Jew/converso Alumbrado -> Jesuits.
I tend to disagree on your interpretation of Disraeli's statement:
(a) I think that the first Jesuits were actually Jewish as the book I linked to provides strong evidence for. It's worth noting that Loyola himself came from a converso family - and the other key founder was a relation (from memory - nephew) of the Borgia (Alexander VI?) pope. And that Borgia was himself Jewish was common knowledge/rumor at the time - and his behavior was of course consistent with what we see from occult kabbalist societies throughout history.
(b) whether Jesuits remain influential today is one question (and I do not necessarily agree that they are not), but that they were not influential at the time Disraeli wrote seems very questionable to me...
Quick further comment (which is intended to follow the one which starts "it is often suggested..." but may - or may not - end up appearing above it owing to the nature of substack's design or my lack of understanding thereof :-)
Here is the full passage from Coningsby:
"Yet the Jews, Coningsby, are essentially Tories. Toryism, indeed, is but copied from the mighty prototype which has fashioned Europe. And every generation they must become more powerful and more dangerous to the society which is hostile to them. Do you think that the quiet humdrum persecution of a decorous representative of an English university can crush those who have successively baffled the Pharaohs, Nebuchadnezzar, Rome, and the Feudal ages? The fact is, you cannot destroy a pure race of the Caucasian organisation. It is a physiological fact; a simple law of nature, which has baffled Egyptian and Assyrian Kings, Roman Emperors, and Christian Inquisitors. No penal laws, no physical tortures, can effect that a superior race should be absorbed in an inferior, or be destroyed by it. The mixed persecuting races disappear; the pure persecuted race remains. And at this moment, in spite of centuries, of tens of centuries, of degradation, the Jewish mind exercises a vast influence on the affairs of Europe. I speak not of their laws, which you still obey; of their literature, with which your minds are saturated; but of the living Hebrew intellect.
"'You never observe a great intellectual movement in Europe in which the Jews do not greatly participate. The first Jesuits were Jews; that mysterious Russian Diplomacy which so alarms Western Europe is organised and principally carried on by Jews; that mighty revolution which is at this moment preparing in Germany, and which will be, in fact, a second and greater Reformation, and of which so little is as yet known in England, is entirely developing under the auspices of Jews, who almost monopolise the professorial chairs of Germany. Neander, the founder of Spiritual Christianity, and who is Regius Professor of Divinity in the University of Berlin, is a Jew. Benary, equally famous, and in the same University, is a Jew. Wehl, the Arabic Professor of Heidelberg, is a Jew. Years ago, when I was In Palestine, I met a German student who was accumulating materials for the History of Christianity, and studying the genius of the place; a modest and learned man. It was Wehl; then unknown, since become the first Arabic scholar of the day, and the author of the life of Mahomet. But for the German professors of this race, their name is Legion. I think there are more than ten at Berlin alone."
It's pretty clear from the larger context that Disraeli intends his statements literally here - it's hard to read the whole passage and conclude that he's making a generic point about social activism - at least that's the way I read it.
I'll take that into consideration, I haven't made up my mind on the matter. Thank you. Also, my assumption comes from knowing about Kulturkampf under Otto von Bismarck. Once you understand what that was about, it's very easy to understand why "Jesuit" would have been synonymous with powerful political movements, subversion, assassination, and cunning. Jesuits were notorious for running things behind the scenes in Europe before WWI.
Well we're very much in agreement on the perfidy and power of the Jesuits!
The question pertains only as to exactly who they were, whom they served (if not themselves), and whether they were infiltratee as much as infiltrator.
Occult (kabbalistic) societies are specifically designed to be controlled by a tiny group or even a single entity whose true motives and goals are hidden from the rest of the group. Who controls who is an interesting exercise - my belief is Rothschilds currently rule - but of course they too are misled and controlled by Satan himself (for whom they reputedly lay a place at their dinner table - obviously I have no idea if this is true but it's definitely salacious :-)).
PS - re-reading this "their name is Legion" is a very interesting turn of phrase too.
I am adding this article to my British Plandemonium graph. In particular, I can see why the Los Alumbrados would be raised in Spain, which took over through marriage after the Portugese opened trade around Africa into Asia.
https://embed.kumu.io/9bdf8304d88e0261af2fd5eae77f994f
Always impressed by how your research fills in so many blanks.
Interesting. It's apparent that the Green movement is a death cult, but I never equated them with the Pale Horse before.
Repent your sins and renege Satan, protestant heretic!!!!! The fire of hell awaits for the agents of Satan like you.