JD Vance isn't a _real_ veteran, he worked as a journalist and was in Iraq in a non-combat role taking photos and writing articles. He did the bare minimum essentially just to use the GI Bill for college and gain that social credit for when he was going to run for office. JD Vance isn't a regular person - read his autobiography if you don't believe me. It's suspicious that his book got turned into a major film with A-list actors. Vance worked for Peter Thiel (mega sussy) out of nowhere, then Thiel funded his run for Senate in Ohio, which he won. After the Trump "assassination attempt", Thiel gave a call to Trump to convince him to make Vance his running mate.
Q: Why would Thiel do any of this for Vance? A: Thiel probably has serious blackmail on Vance and can control him completely. (Thiel also controls Hulk Hogan, which is why he joined the Trump campaign.) There's way more to write about, but if you haven't looked into Peter Thiel, Palantir (and its connections to Israel), and the PayPal Mafia, it might be worth your time. Good article, thanks!
Anyone who serves in the military is a veteran. Someone shouldn’t have to be hit with shrapnel to qualify. I don’t disagree with the overall sentiment but I doubt any veterans who see this will respect anything you have to say. It will severely impact how seriously you are taken.
Despite my tone, thank you for reading my post. Where I'm from in America, what I said isn't that uncommon of a sentiment (non-danger roles aren't "real vet" status), but it's true that Vance is a vet by the standard definition. I have multiple veterans in my family who don't consider themselves on the same level as some who fought in the Korean War.
You are welcome. There is a difference between combat veterans and veterans who have not been placed in that situation. The difference is not one of choice though. All of them have volunteered to be placed in harm's way. Some are less fortunate and are actually put there. You are correct in saying that there are roles less prone to danger. I myself am a veteran who was deployed. I was never in a combat situation, thankfully. I can tell you that the time away from my family and the sacrifices they made by having me gone were real. When I'm somewhere and they ask veterans to stand, I stand for them, not for myself. I appreciate your clarification and wish you a wonderful day.
I’m not sure I understand the question. I think people should separate the difference between the definition of veteran status is from how they feel about who a person is. You can be a veteran and do great things or terrible things. I think it’s counterproductive to criticize someone’s status as a veteran when making legitimate statements about their actions. I agree with the points made by Charles about the wisdom of allowing someone like J.D. Vance to have such an influential role. My intention was to help strengthen his position, not criticize it. Have a blessed day.
I also hope that you're wrong here, but your intuition generally serves you quite well. All in God's hands. My intuition also makes me think that the proverbial hornet's nest is about to get a swift kick.
This all seems very possible. Especially with Rubio being considered for SOS. I remember some thing about rubio advocating to unclassify certain ufo files.
Talking of Trump 'getting himself killed', I don't know if you are familiar with the English Substacker Miri AF, Terry. She is speculating that Trump may be fake-assassinated (as predictively programmed, with Trump already casting aspersions on Iran for the previous 'attempt' on his life). I didn't watch the election too closely, from across the Pond, but I gather Vance is an alleged recent-atheist-turned-Catholic. Miri further speculates that Vance may implement theocratic-type policies (again, predictively programmed, this time the Handmaid's Tale) to deliberately cause a huge anti-Christian backlash similar to developments described in your own writing. Miri believes in God but isn't a Christian. She is, however, very aware of the elites' intention to get rid of religions (apart from their planned world religion), especially Christianity.
It's in the same ballpark as what I expect, but my emphasis is on the backlash to his policies and changes, and how that escalates on both sides. Her insights into Vance are good.
Your take sounds quite likely possible to me . There seems to be too much falling into place if you will. I am not sure how this outcome might be any different from that of a uniparty pulling the strings. If the Reset globalists are reeling, who or what would be behind the Reawakening? Also as plausible as this may be it does perhaps discount the effect of some higher consciousness beings who could perhaps shift the collective consciousness so that the outcome not be so dire?
The idea of Trump being a new face of the Uniparty assumes that everyone in the establishment knows what Trump represents and has been fighting him as kayfabe. But if my theory is correct, they are hoping to prevent his VERSION of the "Reset". They want a Reset where America is *subordinated* into the global order and the globalists run things from Round Table groups. Trump's version is to have America *dominate* the global order and act independently, in its own interests. Either way it involves a Collapse, but the question is who comes out on top.
Ah that distinction between the aims/versions is helpful. So that would suggest that different parties or players were behind his rise and selection since you seem to be saying he was long being prepared for this role.
JD Vance isn't a _real_ veteran, he worked as a journalist and was in Iraq in a non-combat role taking photos and writing articles. He did the bare minimum essentially just to use the GI Bill for college and gain that social credit for when he was going to run for office. JD Vance isn't a regular person - read his autobiography if you don't believe me. It's suspicious that his book got turned into a major film with A-list actors. Vance worked for Peter Thiel (mega sussy) out of nowhere, then Thiel funded his run for Senate in Ohio, which he won. After the Trump "assassination attempt", Thiel gave a call to Trump to convince him to make Vance his running mate.
Q: Why would Thiel do any of this for Vance? A: Thiel probably has serious blackmail on Vance and can control him completely. (Thiel also controls Hulk Hogan, which is why he joined the Trump campaign.) There's way more to write about, but if you haven't looked into Peter Thiel, Palantir (and its connections to Israel), and the PayPal Mafia, it might be worth your time. Good article, thanks!
Anyone who serves in the military is a veteran. Someone shouldn’t have to be hit with shrapnel to qualify. I don’t disagree with the overall sentiment but I doubt any veterans who see this will respect anything you have to say. It will severely impact how seriously you are taken.
Despite my tone, thank you for reading my post. Where I'm from in America, what I said isn't that uncommon of a sentiment (non-danger roles aren't "real vet" status), but it's true that Vance is a vet by the standard definition. I have multiple veterans in my family who don't consider themselves on the same level as some who fought in the Korean War.
You are welcome. There is a difference between combat veterans and veterans who have not been placed in that situation. The difference is not one of choice though. All of them have volunteered to be placed in harm's way. Some are less fortunate and are actually put there. You are correct in saying that there are roles less prone to danger. I myself am a veteran who was deployed. I was never in a combat situation, thankfully. I can tell you that the time away from my family and the sacrifices they made by having me gone were real. When I'm somewhere and they ask veterans to stand, I stand for them, not for myself. I appreciate your clarification and wish you a wonderful day.
Do you think the same of Pete Buttigieg's time in the military/CIA?
I’m not sure I understand the question. I think people should separate the difference between the definition of veteran status is from how they feel about who a person is. You can be a veteran and do great things or terrible things. I think it’s counterproductive to criticize someone’s status as a veteran when making legitimate statements about their actions. I agree with the points made by Charles about the wisdom of allowing someone like J.D. Vance to have such an influential role. My intention was to help strengthen his position, not criticize it. Have a blessed day.
Jesuit tactics all around
I've got my copy of The Oxford Handbook of the Jesuits right next to me as we speak.
Hegelian dialect at work as believers in Trump take extra long naps :(
Hope you’re wrong Terry!
Bottom line - from the Psalms: “put not your trust in princes”
I also hope that you're wrong here, but your intuition generally serves you quite well. All in God's hands. My intuition also makes me think that the proverbial hornet's nest is about to get a swift kick.
This all seems very possible. Especially with Rubio being considered for SOS. I remember some thing about rubio advocating to unclassify certain ufo files.
Talking of Trump 'getting himself killed', I don't know if you are familiar with the English Substacker Miri AF, Terry. She is speculating that Trump may be fake-assassinated (as predictively programmed, with Trump already casting aspersions on Iran for the previous 'attempt' on his life). I didn't watch the election too closely, from across the Pond, but I gather Vance is an alleged recent-atheist-turned-Catholic. Miri further speculates that Vance may implement theocratic-type policies (again, predictively programmed, this time the Handmaid's Tale) to deliberately cause a huge anti-Christian backlash similar to developments described in your own writing. Miri believes in God but isn't a Christian. She is, however, very aware of the elites' intention to get rid of religions (apart from their planned world religion), especially Christianity.
https://miri.substack.com/p/when-is-a-football-team-most-vulnerable
Do you think this is a possibility or entirely fanciful?
It's in the same ballpark as what I expect, but my emphasis is on the backlash to his policies and changes, and how that escalates on both sides. Her insights into Vance are good.
Thanks for your reply, Terry. I'll be prepared for anything!
Your take sounds quite likely possible to me . There seems to be too much falling into place if you will. I am not sure how this outcome might be any different from that of a uniparty pulling the strings. If the Reset globalists are reeling, who or what would be behind the Reawakening? Also as plausible as this may be it does perhaps discount the effect of some higher consciousness beings who could perhaps shift the collective consciousness so that the outcome not be so dire?
The idea of Trump being a new face of the Uniparty assumes that everyone in the establishment knows what Trump represents and has been fighting him as kayfabe. But if my theory is correct, they are hoping to prevent his VERSION of the "Reset". They want a Reset where America is *subordinated* into the global order and the globalists run things from Round Table groups. Trump's version is to have America *dominate* the global order and act independently, in its own interests. Either way it involves a Collapse, but the question is who comes out on top.
Ah that distinction between the aims/versions is helpful. So that would suggest that different parties or players were behind his rise and selection since you seem to be saying he was long being prepared for this role.
Yes, he is the choice of the cataclysmic "phoenix rising from the ashes" side, not the "steady decline and absorption by the globalist cabal" side.