I'll have to track down others. In private, many of the independents I know never swallowed the story, or at least not whole. Trump supporters are weirdly obtuse about the signs, and say "assassination attempt" without question. They're not even weirded out by the fact that Democrats ALSO aren't questioning the story, which should be the biggest sign that something is rotten in the cybernetic state of Denmark.
I guess nobody told you about the two corpses resulting from that assassination attempt?
You didn't notice the Jack Smith has wasted $25 million on his 2 prosecutions alone?
You don't recall the back to back prosecutions when Trump was in office?
Have you perchance noticed the unprecedented vitriol of Trump's opposition?
Have you looked at US political history over the last 60 years?
Do you realize that you are a bucket of muddy water poured into a crystal-clear pool in which circumstances and potential consequences are in stark relief? that you look like a saboteur, an agent pedaling confusion, apathy and impotence?
They're currently pretending to love Kamala Harris and "accepting her" as their leader. She has been the laughingstock of Washington for at least 8 years.
Nonsense. You think it is worse than during the 70s when there was a real threat of nuclear war? Or the 40s when everyones male kid was at risk of horrible death or 1917-50 in the USSR. Or the slaughter in the ovens, or WW1? Every age cries apocalypse, every generation and yet we soldier on.
A couple of other key facts about the "assassination attempt":
(a) The candidate claimed that the bullet made a "whizzing sound". That is false - supersonic bullets do not make a "whizzing sound". They make a deafening crack. This has been known and studied for many decades and is common knowledge amongst the military. https://peteryim.substack.com/p/supersonic-bullets-produce-deafening
I don't think a) works. If Trump truly had a bullet graze his ear, there's really no way to know how a person might subjectively experience that and put it into words. It's not like you can experimentally test shooting people in the ear and then asking them what they heard. That doesn't make any sense.
Perhaps - regarding (a). We do also have the audio from the microphone - the first gunshot - which supposedly hit the candidate's ear - isn't particularly loud - in contrast to expected level north of 150 dB.
“Before execution, scapegoats were often worshipped like deities… These are the roots of monarchy: every king was a living god, and every god a murdered king. Perhaps every modern king is just a scapegoat who has managed to delay his own execution.” —Peter Thiel
The scapegoating of DJT appears to be essential to his campaign, and I don't see much concern among his supporters whether that campaign is coherent or robust or not. They are focusing on "the Deep (Woke) State" they believe is trying to kill or incarcerate their King, that their King is divinely destined to take down.
They do not suspect (or believe when told) that all such attempts are (it seems to me) manufactured ritualistically for his annunciation-coronation, based on a Girardian understanding of social mechanics, learned by Thiel under his mentor RG at Stanford.
Perhaps my opinion of regular Americans is too low, but do you really think Kamala doesn't have significant support? (you wrote "phony tidal wave of 'support'"). If so, why? (Perhaps you just mean support from the deep state, which I would counter by noting Kamala's support from Clintons, Obamas, MSM, etc.) I live in an always red state, so I lack direct anecdotal evidence of it, but I have an easy time believing Kamala has greater popular support than Trump currently. She seems to be an appealing candidate to women, LGBT, and racial minorities.
Your assessment of the floundering Trump campaign is good. Younger American conservatives (like the America First movement) seem to be actively turning on Trump's campaign and Trump himself this time around, too.
Kamala Harris dropped out of the presidential race last time with no delegates or wins. She was completely rejected by Democrats, and was considered a laughingstock. Her selection as Vice President was also considered a totally DEI pick, and nobody respected her in office. Even Jon Stewart made fun of her on a recent Daily Show segment, saying she hasn't accomplished anything and nobody has anything positive to say about her. So yes, the "support" is anti-Trump, not pro-Kamala. The left hates Kamala, she's just sort of floating into power by the laws of political correctness.
They need to rally and "support" her now just like they "supported" Biden until he dropped out, and then they immediately shouted for joy and were relieved to not have to put up that charade anymore.
The Democrat party is very good at not breaking ranks. Yeah, nobody respected her back then, but most people have very bad memory when it comes to political history. And most politicians aren't above adapting their views to survive the current zeitgeist. Saying her support is just anti-Trump, not pro-Kamala really just seems like semantics. Regardless of whether the average leftist thinks Kamala is their ideal candidate doesn't mean they won't vote for her -- that is real support, imo. The leftist expectation is that she will continue Biden's status quo.
Also, Jon Stewart is still a Zionist Jew even if he has criticisms of Israel's current government -> and Trump has won over most of that lobby, so of course many in the media will be more fair to him than they were in 2016. Kamala has also paid lip-service to the Zionist lobby, so I don't think they would mind her being president.
On voting day, many hardline democrats did not show up to vote for Hillary Clinton despite professing to support her 100%. Morale was low and turnout reflected it. Biden "broke records" by a fraudulent counting system, so who knows what they'll do this time.
I agree with your comment here. But I don't think Kamala's target is really "hardline democrats", I would call them low-info voters (people who don't follow geopolitics at all). Most people aren't hardline at all, they ride the fence until outside pressure pushes them to a side, then they hop the fence once their side crumbles underneath them. I think it's easier for Kamala to drum up simpleton support because her background isn't nearly as diabolical as Hillary Clinton's. More importantly, you've got to recognize how ignorant and brainwashed most Americans are. Remember that most Americans gladly got the COVID vaccine, circumcised their sons, and went into insane debt for a degree with no actual education.
): Despite all that, the voting is rigged and both candidates are bad, so yeah.
About the fake shooting, let me tell you one weird thing I found (I think I was the first to found about it, but maybe more people found about it before me, so I don't want credit)
It's an esoteric detail that may be purely coincidental and not weird at all.
The patsy Crooks name is a metaphor for the word "tribes" in Old testament Hebrew. A crook is a staff that a shepherd uses to manage the sheep. There are two words that can be translated as a staff mattah and shebet but these words are also used in reference to a single tribe or to the tribes in general.
About the 'campaign,' clearly it's all fake, a money-making show at best.
I want to see the XX amendment in action. If the electoral college fails to elect a president, then the House has to choose the president they want. Imagine they choose Kennedy. It would be hilarious, everyone is supposed to utterly hate Kennedy.
Maybe they choose anyone else. Imagine the worst. Or the best. Is Willie Nelson still alive? He is from the same year as the amendment. It would be so much fun for everyone to see all voters finally united in hating democracy. Liberals and Conservatives could become friends for about twenty minutes, until Willie makes cannabis smoking mandatory and they become divided again. My body my choice and all that.
No, this is my normal self. I almost always comment in long gear. Commenting gets dicey only if I am fed after the sunset.😂😂
I don't smoke. I tried getting into tobacco, but it wasn't for me.
But, more importantly, I hope you see the inversions they practice on people all the time. They make the left say right wing things like "no jab no pay", and the right say lefty things, like "human rights." There are many examples. It's everywhere.
I added your article to my Trump graph on a node called "Not Buying It."
https://embed.kumu.io/2b91621e803603405af317b8376a83ee
I'll have to track down others. In private, many of the independents I know never swallowed the story, or at least not whole. Trump supporters are weirdly obtuse about the signs, and say "assassination attempt" without question. They're not even weirded out by the fact that Democrats ALSO aren't questioning the story, which should be the biggest sign that something is rotten in the cybernetic state of Denmark.
Gee, I wonder why Cheadle resigned, after this “psyop.”
Great graph. I missed it.
I see you mention "border wal psyop." Was that a psyop?
I've searched your substack to see if you had written something about that, but the search on substack fails a lot. Stupid ai enhancements.
Anyway, why was that a psyop? It surprises me because I know of many experienced political comentators who seem to buy it completely.
This is the most important one:
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/whats-up-with-aoc-and-border-security-ae7
This one is shorter, but also important:
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/a-pandemic-of-border-insecurity
thank you!
I guess nobody told you about the two corpses resulting from that assassination attempt?
You didn't notice the Jack Smith has wasted $25 million on his 2 prosecutions alone?
You don't recall the back to back prosecutions when Trump was in office?
Have you perchance noticed the unprecedented vitriol of Trump's opposition?
Have you looked at US political history over the last 60 years?
Do you realize that you are a bucket of muddy water poured into a crystal-clear pool in which circumstances and potential consequences are in stark relief? that you look like a saboteur, an agent pedaling confusion, apathy and impotence?
Maybe not, but I doubt it.
You fell for the Psyop.
BOOM!!!
I'm a paleo conservative yet have told my family this feels forced, too.
It's as silly as HIllary VS Trump.
Stupidest thing I have ever read!
Buy the Trump NFTs, you'll be rich!
BS
I suspect you are the psyop.
I find pondering Exodus 21 to be interesting in this.
This is funny. In a sick, Freemason kind of way. You say “sympathy” was not “generated” in a psychotic klutz group of hopeless NPCs? ALERT TWITTER!
And the Rock is widely loathed on the right and the left will never accept him as a leader, too snobbish.
They're currently pretending to love Kamala Harris and "accepting her" as their leader. She has been the laughingstock of Washington for at least 8 years.
Nonsense. You think it is worse than during the 70s when there was a real threat of nuclear war? Or the 40s when everyones male kid was at risk of horrible death or 1917-50 in the USSR. Or the slaughter in the ovens, or WW1? Every age cries apocalypse, every generation and yet we soldier on.
I don't think the daily situation is currently worse than those periods. Where did you get that from?
A couple of other key facts about the "assassination attempt":
(a) The candidate claimed that the bullet made a "whizzing sound". That is false - supersonic bullets do not make a "whizzing sound". They make a deafening crack. This has been known and studied for many decades and is common knowledge amongst the military. https://peteryim.substack.com/p/supersonic-bullets-produce-deafening
(b) The bullet photograph from the assassination attempt is the first of its kind - ever. There was supposedly one previous photograph of a bullet at that exposure time - but it is clearly a fake. https://peteryim.substack.com/p/reference-bullet-photograph-fabricated
I don't think a) works. If Trump truly had a bullet graze his ear, there's really no way to know how a person might subjectively experience that and put it into words. It's not like you can experimentally test shooting people in the ear and then asking them what they heard. That doesn't make any sense.
b) is interesting though
Perhaps - regarding (a). We do also have the audio from the microphone - the first gunshot - which supposedly hit the candidate's ear - isn't particularly loud - in contrast to expected level north of 150 dB.
Yes (& LOL at Cringe-Lord), BUT:
“Before execution, scapegoats were often worshipped like deities… These are the roots of monarchy: every king was a living god, and every god a murdered king. Perhaps every modern king is just a scapegoat who has managed to delay his own execution.” —Peter Thiel
The scapegoating of DJT appears to be essential to his campaign, and I don't see much concern among his supporters whether that campaign is coherent or robust or not. They are focusing on "the Deep (Woke) State" they believe is trying to kill or incarcerate their King, that their King is divinely destined to take down.
They do not suspect (or believe when told) that all such attempts are (it seems to me) manufactured ritualistically for his annunciation-coronation, based on a Girardian understanding of social mechanics, learned by Thiel under his mentor RG at Stanford.
https://childrenofjob.substack.com/p/peter-thiels-goon-squad-designer
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6l20GfTCllqA
Perhaps my opinion of regular Americans is too low, but do you really think Kamala doesn't have significant support? (you wrote "phony tidal wave of 'support'"). If so, why? (Perhaps you just mean support from the deep state, which I would counter by noting Kamala's support from Clintons, Obamas, MSM, etc.) I live in an always red state, so I lack direct anecdotal evidence of it, but I have an easy time believing Kamala has greater popular support than Trump currently. She seems to be an appealing candidate to women, LGBT, and racial minorities.
Your assessment of the floundering Trump campaign is good. Younger American conservatives (like the America First movement) seem to be actively turning on Trump's campaign and Trump himself this time around, too.
Kamala Harris dropped out of the presidential race last time with no delegates or wins. She was completely rejected by Democrats, and was considered a laughingstock. Her selection as Vice President was also considered a totally DEI pick, and nobody respected her in office. Even Jon Stewart made fun of her on a recent Daily Show segment, saying she hasn't accomplished anything and nobody has anything positive to say about her. So yes, the "support" is anti-Trump, not pro-Kamala. The left hates Kamala, she's just sort of floating into power by the laws of political correctness.
They need to rally and "support" her now just like they "supported" Biden until he dropped out, and then they immediately shouted for joy and were relieved to not have to put up that charade anymore.
The Democrat party is very good at not breaking ranks. Yeah, nobody respected her back then, but most people have very bad memory when it comes to political history. And most politicians aren't above adapting their views to survive the current zeitgeist. Saying her support is just anti-Trump, not pro-Kamala really just seems like semantics. Regardless of whether the average leftist thinks Kamala is their ideal candidate doesn't mean they won't vote for her -- that is real support, imo. The leftist expectation is that she will continue Biden's status quo.
Also, Jon Stewart is still a Zionist Jew even if he has criticisms of Israel's current government -> and Trump has won over most of that lobby, so of course many in the media will be more fair to him than they were in 2016. Kamala has also paid lip-service to the Zionist lobby, so I don't think they would mind her being president.
On voting day, many hardline democrats did not show up to vote for Hillary Clinton despite professing to support her 100%. Morale was low and turnout reflected it. Biden "broke records" by a fraudulent counting system, so who knows what they'll do this time.
I agree with your comment here. But I don't think Kamala's target is really "hardline democrats", I would call them low-info voters (people who don't follow geopolitics at all). Most people aren't hardline at all, they ride the fence until outside pressure pushes them to a side, then they hop the fence once their side crumbles underneath them. I think it's easier for Kamala to drum up simpleton support because her background isn't nearly as diabolical as Hillary Clinton's. More importantly, you've got to recognize how ignorant and brainwashed most Americans are. Remember that most Americans gladly got the COVID vaccine, circumcised their sons, and went into insane debt for a degree with no actual education.
): Despite all that, the voting is rigged and both candidates are bad, so yeah.
Hello Terry!
About the fake shooting, let me tell you one weird thing I found (I think I was the first to found about it, but maybe more people found about it before me, so I don't want credit)
It's an esoteric detail that may be purely coincidental and not weird at all.
The patsy Crooks name is a metaphor for the word "tribes" in Old testament Hebrew. A crook is a staff that a shepherd uses to manage the sheep. There are two words that can be translated as a staff mattah and shebet but these words are also used in reference to a single tribe or to the tribes in general.
https://biblehub.com/hebrew/4294.htm
https://biblehub.com/hebrew/7626.htm
I think it's weird.
About the 'campaign,' clearly it's all fake, a money-making show at best.
I want to see the XX amendment in action. If the electoral college fails to elect a president, then the House has to choose the president they want. Imagine they choose Kennedy. It would be hilarious, everyone is supposed to utterly hate Kennedy.
Maybe they choose anyone else. Imagine the worst. Or the best. Is Willie Nelson still alive? He is from the same year as the amendment. It would be so much fun for everyone to see all voters finally united in hating democracy. Liberals and Conservatives could become friends for about twenty minutes, until Willie makes cannabis smoking mandatory and they become divided again. My body my choice and all that.
Obviously, you are smoking something at the moment. 🙄
No, this is my normal self. I almost always comment in long gear. Commenting gets dicey only if I am fed after the sunset.😂😂
I don't smoke. I tried getting into tobacco, but it wasn't for me.
But, more importantly, I hope you see the inversions they practice on people all the time. They make the left say right wing things like "no jab no pay", and the right say lefty things, like "human rights." There are many examples. It's everywhere.
Arsenic, hopefully.
This has to be a parody.
Paragraphs are your friend, probably your only friend...