6 Comments
User's avatar
Rob Dubya's avatar

I agree with much of what you say here with regard to the confusion being sewn by the new agers and the more extreme conspiracy theorists, though I dont really like the term, and what is considered extreme would be most subjective, to say the least. Coming from a place of atheism 6 years ago, and with no personal guide, I have found myself meander through Bhuddism, New Agism, Multiverseism and Christianity and now I am in a state of perpetual contemplation. I do believe in intelligent design, i do believe that there is creative power, and I do believe in that good and evil are tangible. I struggle to see the Bible as much more than a metphorical instruction manual or how to build a strong society with values and priciples that, if followed, will lead to a joyful existence, and if I'm being honest, i'd really like to believe it THE WORD of God, but I'm still working on that. Ass for Proff Dave and the flat earthers, I always found his mockery quite off putting, I don't know where I stand on FE, as everything I thought I knew was told to me by institutions and agencies that I now know spout endless lies. Maybe its because i'm not intellectually savvy enough to figure it out for myself, But Ihave some questions about the globe earth model that I don't feel get answered well enough for me. Maybe I've come to the stage where I want the earth to be flat, just because. I really don't feel like I know anything for sure anymore. Thanks Terry, you got me thinking...again.

Expand full comment
Farleyboy's avatar

From your interview on Bekoming recently you said,

"the biggest doctrinal pitfalls are anything that comes from the Catholic or Orthodox Churches (which are parts of “the Beast”

Major slam to the Orthodox church, for some reason, after all you wrote sounding like you had it all worked out.

Expand full comment
alexxxxxxxx's avatar

... again dave is .... potential energy is not in the object but its relation and reaction to that field,... ie withought the energy field the object has no energy... thats why its called potential... ie it may potentially acquire energy from the energy field potentially ie maybe ,,, potential means POSSIBLE not inherent...dear Good God please enlighten our darkness

Expand full comment
alexxxxxxxx's avatar

profess or dave is proving and demon strating scientific bias and deception by omission in the definition of conjugation ,,, here is the etymology of conjugation ...https://www.etymonline.com/word/conjugate

Expand full comment
BowTiedIronHide's avatar

Why did God have to send himself down to earth to become his own son to sacrifice himself to himself just to convince himself to forgive us ?

Expand full comment
Terry Wolfe's avatar

He didn't.

Expand full comment