What is the biggest False Binary?

A warning to the watchdogs

This is my reaction piece to the inaugural discussion panel of the Independent Media Alliance. Check out their full discussion here:

Debunking the False Binary with the Independent Media Alliance

I was happy to see my friend Hrvoje Moric (of

Geopolitics & Empire

) join the Independent Media Alliance group to kick off their inaugural roundtable discussion, which revolved around the “false binary” strategy of the social engineering class.

Also on the panel were Ryan Cristián (The Last American Vagabond Substack), Derrick Broze (Derrick Broze), Steve Poikonen (AM Wake Up), Iain Davis (Iain Davis), and Kit Knightly (Kit Knightly). Not present but already mentioned as being part of the group is Whitney Webb and James Corbett. This is a heavy-hitting selection of full-time analysts, journalists, and thinkers. Very impressive, and something that I have wanted to see for a long time.

I have nothing but good wishes for this group. However, I do have some big questions about how their discussion unfolded. I suppose this is in keeping with some of their mottos, which include thinking for yourself, questioning everything, and not accepting false binaries (obviously). I am sure they will produce tons of amazing stuff in the future, and I look forward to what’s next from them.

---

Their talk was posted to Substack three days after I published my piece on why a high-tech dystopian future isn’t feasible, which seemed serendipitous to me:

Most of the discussion of the IMA panel revolved around an absolute certainty that the future we’re headed for is a high-tech control grid with more digital enslavement infrastructure, more centralization, and more top-down authority. Having personally talked about this very topic for years with Hrvoje, first on his Dissident Thinker podcast, and then on his TNT Radio show, I feel obliged to chime in and give my two cents once again, to show where I line up with their assessment.

---

Binary vs. Dialectic

Surprisingly, nobody mentioned the term “dialectic” once in the conversation. I searched with Substack’s (excellent) transcript tool for the word, and confirmed it:

Zero results for dialectic in a discussion about false binaries.

Hegel and his ideas about social evolution through major ideological conflicts has been adapted and weaponized long ago. People need to know about the Thesis, Antithesis, and Synthesis process—especially if we’re going to talk about alternatives to the Big Bad Digital Control Grid That Is Definitely Going To Happen Any Day Now. Anyone who understands the false binary game should know that alternatives are precisely what is meant by “Antithesis” in Hegel’s formula!

It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that social engineers would help foster and guide their own opposition, so even design their own false plan for cartoonish world domination exactly to trigger that backlash. When the time comes for bloodshed and mayhem, both sides can destroy each other and the social engineers can implement the Synthesis that was the real goal all along. I call this real goal “Spiritual Technocracy” in the article I wrote for Geopolitics & Empire years ago.

The Antithesis is usually as dumb as the Thesis. It is always unrealistic, inadequate, idealistic, prone to excess, etc. Now I don’t wanna come right out and say that starting your own garden and living off-grid is dumb, because it’s a wonderful exercise and builds cool skills, but if you believe that you’re really going to be allowed to peacefully thrive outside of the world’s most ruthless hegemony, you’re at least as dumb as believing that Skynet is around the corner and robots will rule the world.¹

As I said in the introduction to my discussion with Hrvoje Moric in our first discussion, I consider myself a “Dissident Thinker” because I question the alternatives even more than the mainstream.²

I found it more than a little suspicious how aggressively some IMA presenters insisted on a new binary to replace the old “false” one: that of centralization-versus-decentralization. Once you understand Hegelian Dialectic, this itself can be recognized as an obvious false binary. It is another way of saying “Great Reset vs. Great Awakening,” which is a false binary truly dominating culture today.

It is the most successful psyop of the last 50 years.

Another “Great Awakening” Vehicle?

Everyone who becomes part of the Independent Media Alliance had better be careful to not fall into the trap of the “Great Awakening” narrative. If they do fall into it, they will play directly into the hands of the very social engineers they are trying to subvert.

The Great Reset = The Great Awakening. When the Collapse happens, these narratives converge. We end up with a post-apocalyptic, post-truth world of broken infrastructure and earth worship, with communitarian villages at the local level, and elite “stewardship” on a global scale to make sure population levels are kept in check and the human livestock is tended. It is truly the New (Dark) Age of Neofeudalism.

This is a plan more than a century in the making. Thesis, Antithesis, Convergence.

If you want to expose a false binary, expose the Great Awakening.

I wrote about this more directly here:

Since I believe in prophecy, not solutions, I already know that my warning (if it is accurate) will not manage to change the course of events. My books, TikTok account, podcasts, etc. will not prevent the agenda from coming into fruition. As the hosts of the IMA panel said repeatedly, people give up when they don’t see a way out. Ironically, they are motivated by the illusion of a way out which has been prepared for them by the same social engineers they hate.

To understand how the Alternative has been curated and managed by powerful forces, you need to start doing your homework on Theosophy, Gaia, Oneness, and the Aquarian Conspiracy. It has become The Movement That Has No Name. When I last talked about this with Hrvoje on his podcast, it received double the engagement of many other, bigger, more popular guests that he has had on. To me, that means that the message was powerful and people love to hear the truth about this, even though it’s painful to realize there’s no way out.

Terry Wolfe: The New Age, the Great Awakening, & the Green World Order

I was proud to see that Hrvoje was sticking with the attitude I respect him for, which is that people who have knowledge about these things are obligated to fight against deception even if we can’t change the outcome. We have a duty to serve as obstacles to the inevitable, even if it destroys us.

I think the real reason why this approach is so distasteful to non-Christians is because they don’t have the comfort that the Lord is 1) in control of our lives, no matter how bad things get, and 2) we will receive rewards in the next life.

Unbelievers are extremely susceptible to fear for this reason. They want a hero, or to become a hero, not prophecy and an afterlife. They resent the believers. This is another reason why Christians will become the scapegoat of the Alternative when their own stupid plans to escape the inevitable fail. The “doomsaying” or “blackpill” as they call it, will become the pretext for destroying us, while they fall for ever more embarrassing honeytraps, psyops, and false lights.

Share if you enjoy this.

Subscribe if you want to support my work.

Talk to me if you have thoughts.

1. It’s very possible that automated kill bots will target and destroy enemies of the system, but that’s not policing.

2. This is not to say that I trust the mainstream; I mean that they are not even worth questioning, because they are irrelevant and being kept afloat purely as a red herring to keep the Alternative looking good.